Didi Bredberg Canizares vs Eliz Maloney Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 01 Jul at 09:55 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
D. Bredberg Canizares vs E. Maloney

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

GBR
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Canizares 1 - 0 Maloney
They have played 2 sets in total, with Didi Bredberg Canizares winning 2 and Eliz Maloney winning 0. The last match between Didi Bredberg Canizares and Eliz Maloney was at the W15 Getxo, 02-07-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Didi Bredberg Canizares getting the victory 6-2 6-1.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Canizares | 1 |
| Maloney | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) W15 Getxo(07-02-25)
D. B. Canizares vs E. Maloney H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 50.00% (25-25) | Career Total W/L | 53.18% (117-103) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
D. B. Canizares vs E. Maloney Match Preview:
- Canizares has a stronger second serve, winning 37.76% of points in the past 6 months, compared to Maloney's 33.55%. Does this give Canizares an edge? Likely, as this stat is closely linked to match outcomes.
- When facing second serves, Canizares outperforms Maloney, winning 49.12% of returns against Maloney's 46.11%.
- Canizares also excels in first serve returns, achieving 40.98% compared to Maloney’s 31.31%.
- Under pressure, Maloney is slightly better, having saved 51.16% of breakpoints, while Canizares has saved 45.21%.
- In the past year, Canizares has a higher win rate at 58.62% versus Maloney’s 50%.
- Surface preferences show Canizares thrives on clay courts with a 56% win rate, whereas Maloney's best is on indoor hard courts with the same win percentage.
- Both have similar win rates at their usual tournament levels, with Canizares at 60% and Maloney at 58.82%, but they face different levels of competition.
- Canizares competes against higher-tier opponents with an average rank of 193.93 compared to Maloney’s 269.64.
- In decisive moments, Canizares holds a significant advantage, winning 63% of deciding sets in the last year compared to Maloney's 25%.
- Canizares demonstrates superior breakpoint conversion at 52.94%, while Maloney manages only 31.71%.
Editorial Prediction (July 1, 2025, UTC):
Both players exhibit unique strengths; however, Canizares has demonstrated stronger performance in key statistics such as second serve success, return game efficiency, and breakpoint conversion. These factors are crucial in determining match outcomes.
Although Maloney shows resilience under pressure with a slightly higher breakpoint save percentage, Canizares’ ability to convert crucial points and thrive in deciding sets provides a significant edge.
Canizares' experience against higher-ranked opponents and adaptability to different surfaces further solidify their advantage.
Given these factors, Canizares is favored to win the upcoming match against Maloney.
Didi Bredberg Canizares vs Eliz Maloney Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
D. B. Canizares vs E. Maloney H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 3 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 1:22:27 | Average Match Time | 1:22:27 |
| 83% (43/52) | 1st Serve % | 68% (41/60) |
| 60% (26/43) | 1st Serve Win % | 46% (19/41) |
| 78% (7/9) | 2nd Serve Win % | 53% (10/19) |
| 50% (5/10) | Break Pts Won % | 0% (0/4) |
| 52% (31/60) | Return Points Win % | 37% (19/52) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
D. B. Canizares Recent Matches Played
E. Maloney Recent Matches Played

D. B. Canizares vs E. Maloney Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 50.00% (25/25) | YTD Win/Loss | 53.18% (117/103) |
| 51.79% (58/54) | Sets Win/Loss | 53.39% (260/227) |
| 52.56% (544/491) | Games Win/Loss | 51.73% (2287/2134) |
| 29.41% (5/12) | Hard Win/Loss | 55.65% (69/55) |
| 58.62% (17/12) | Clay Win/Loss | 48.57% (17/18) |
| 75.00% (3/1) | Indoor Hard W/L | 53.45% (31/27) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0.00% (0/3) |
| 0.02 | Aces Per Game | 0.1 |
| 10 | Aces Total | 218 |
| 0.16 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.14 |
| 78 | Total Double Faults | 312 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:5:45 |
| 263.94 | Average Opponent Rank | 426.85 |
| 69% (854/1244) | 1st Serve % | 69% (6636/9629) |
| 56% (477/854) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (3885/6636) |
| 43% (166/390) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (1338/2993) |
| 50% (63/126) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (550/1181) |
| 44% (537/1217) | Return Points Win % | 45% (4293/9502) |
| 43.48% (10/13) | Challenger W/L | 48.54% (50/53) |
| 55.56% (15/12) | Futures W/L | 57.26% (67/50) |
| 52% (25/48) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 53% (117/219) |
| 67% (4/6) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 65% (20/31) |
| 46% (6/13) | Deciding Set Win % | 46% (22/48) |
| 88% (25/22) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (122/108) |
| 8% (25/2) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (122/14) |
| 12% (25/3) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 9% (98/9) |